Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(2): 329-335, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-889754

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of laboratory indicators is important for predicting changes in disease severity and clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify the critical predictors that can effectively assess the disease conditions of patients with COVID-19 by analyzing the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: All consecutive patients (n = 294) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the PLA from February 6 to February 21, 2020, were enrolled. These patients were divided into the severe group and the nonsevere group according to disease severity during hospitalization. RESULTS: The median neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) value of the severe patients was dramatically higher than that of the nonsevere patients (10.4 vs 2.6; P < .001). The NLR value equal to 5 was a boundary value worthy of reference, because more than 80% severe patients had an NLR value greater than 5 and over 80% nonsevere patients had an NLR value less than 5. The NLR value of these COVID-19 patients was positively and respectively correlated with the values of C-reactive protein (R = .5921, P < .001), lactate dehydrogenase (R = .4509, P < .001), procalcitonin (R = .5504, P < .001), fibrinogen (R = .4710, P < .001), and D-dimers (R = .4425, P < .001). However, the NLR value was merely and positively correlated with the interleukin-6 value (R = .3594, P < .05), but had no correlations with the values of interleukin-10, interleukin-4, interleukin-17, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α (P > .05). DISCUSSION: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a critical predictor for assessment of disease severity in patients with COVID-19, and it has a close relation with the laboratory indicators related to disease conditions.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Neutrófilos/patologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Linfócitos T/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/patologia , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangue , L-Lactato Desidrogenase/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Neutrófilos/virologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/virologia
2.
J Clin Virol ; 130: 104576, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-706094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The unsatisfactory accuracy and capacity of real time RT-PCR depends on several unavoidable reasons, which cannot meet the demands for COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: 206 serum samples were collected from patients who were treated in the General Hospital of the Central Theater Command of the PLA between January 18 and April 4, 2020. 270 serum samples from healthy blood donors were used as control. IgM and total antibodies (Ab) against SARS-CoV-2 were detected by Chemiluminescence Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA). RESULTS: Among the 206 patients, the positive rate of IgM and Ab were 149/206 (72.3 %) and 187/206 (90.8 %), respectively. And the specificity of IgM and Ab detection were 99.3 % and 98.9 %, respectively. The sensitivity of CMIA for Ab detection was significantly higher than that of IgM. An increase of the positive rate and S/CO value for detecting IgM and Ab accompanied with the increasing of days post-disease onset (d.p.o.) were observed. The positive rate of Ab detected by CMIA increased rapidly after 7 d.p.o., while that of IgM was obviously increased after 14 d.p.o.. In addition, the age and gender of these patients did not affect the seroconversion and titer of antibodies during the whole course. The disease-severity of patients had no effect on the seroconversion of antibodies. However, the critical patients possessed a much higher antibody titers than the no-critical cases after 14 d.p.o.. CONCLUSIONS: The CMIA can provide important complementation to nucleic acid assay and help to enhance the accuracy and capacity of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Medições Luminescentes , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Soroconversão
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(6)2020 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-590624

RESUMO

At present, PCR-based nucleic acid detection cannot meet the demands for coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) diagnosis. Two hundred fourteen confirmed COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in the General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army between 18 January and 26 February 2020 were recruited. Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits based on recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid protein (rN) and spike protein (rS) were used for detecting IgM and IgG antibodies, and their diagnostic feasibility was evaluated. Among the 214 patients, 146 (68.2%) and 150 (70.1%) were successfully diagnosed with the rN-based IgM and IgG ELISAs, respectively; 165 (77.1%) and 159 (74.3%) were successfully diagnosed with the rS-based IgM and IgG ELISAs, respectively. The positive rates of the rN-based and rS-based ELISAs for antibody (IgM and/or IgG) detection were 80.4% and 82.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of the rS-based ELISA for IgM detection was significantly higher than that of the rN-based ELISA. We observed an increase in the positive rate for IgM and IgG with an increasing number of days post-disease onset (d.p.o.), but the positive rate of IgM dropped after 35 d.p.o. The positive rate of rN-based and rS-based IgM and IgG ELISAs was less than 60% during the early stage of the illness, 0 to 10 d.p.o., and that of IgM and IgG was obviously increased after 10 d.p.o. ELISA has a high sensitivity, especially for the detection of serum samples from patients after 10 d.p.o., so it could be an important supplementary method for COVID-19 diagnosis.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA